shadcn.io is not affiliated with official shadcn/ui
Analyst Quadrant Brand Recognition Awards Block for React
A positioning quadrant in the style of an analyst report for a product-analytics tool: a numbered dot per vendor on vision and execution axes with ours labelled, beside a ranked table of every score.
Installation
Overview
An analyst-quadrant block for React with Base UI. A split behind a solid divider. At the start a title, a sentence and a table of seven vendors, ranked by their two scores added, each with the number that marks it on the chart, its position (Leaders, Challengers, Visionaries or Niche players, read from the scores) and its vision and execution scores out of 100. At the end the quadrant in a frame with + marks on its corners: vision runs across, execution runs up, every vendor is a numbered dot and this product is the filled, labelled one. On a phone the table comes first and the quadrant sits under it. The page's rails and top rule come from the Guides spine. It's built from a native table, Guides and your theme's tokens. The research firm, the vendors and the scores are made up for the example.
FAQ
How do I change the vendors and scores?
Edit VENDORS at the top of the file. Each has a name, a vision and an execution score from 0 to 100, and ours for the one the page is about. The ranking, the numbers on the dots, the dot positions and each vendor's position are all worked out from those scores, so nothing else needs editing. Keep the dots apart: two vendors with nearly equal scores would overlap.
How is a vendor's position decided?
By the half-way line on each axis: 50 or more on vision and on execution is a Leader, high execution with lower vision a Challenger, high vision with lower execution a Visionary and the rest are Niche players. The crossing lines on the chart are drawn at 50, and the position names are in its corners.
Is this a real analyst report?
No. Driftgate Research, the six other vendors and every score are invented, and the chart is not a real market. Don't use a made-up quadrant as evidence: for a real report, quote the analyst's own figure under its licence.
How do screen readers read it?
As the table: a caption names the report, and each row reads the number, the vendor, the position and the two scores, with the vendor's name as the row header. The chart is a drawing hidden from assistive technology, and its caption says how to read it.
Related
- Pro
Platform Rankings Awards
Rankings and scoresA table with one row for each of four review sites, showing a product's rating as read-only stars and words, the review count and its rank in the category, with a foot row for the weighted average.
- Pro
Edition Comparison Awards
Lists and tablesA table by category for a usage-billing API comparing its placement at two editions of an awards programme, each row reading 7th to 3rd with an arrow, the places gained in words, a filled dot on a win and a total row.
- Pro
Re-ranking Leaderboard Awards
Rankings and scoresA ranked table of seven comparison tools in an index, with the site's own row in a ring, a segmented control that ranks it again by overall score, ease of use or support, and a methodology note that folds open.
- Pro
Rating Stars Awards
Rankings and scoresFour review sites as four cells with overshoot, each with read-only stars, the rating in words, the review count and a link, and a footnote that writes out the weighted average of the four.
- Pro
Aggregate Media Coverage Awards
Charts and figuresA split with three counted figures (articles, publications, combined audience) and a ranked list of publications with article counts and derived bars, for a PR-analytics tool; no headlines.
- Pro
Criteria Checklist Awards
Rankings and scoresTwo awards a code-quality scanner is working toward as cells with overshoot lines: a progress bar, a count and five criteria each, met or in review, with the last explained in a disclosure.